Nepheris
Irritating Ignoramus
Posts: 448
|
Thanks a million for that witch, it works fine *sheepie button* What's worrying me is that my winrar keeps throwing corrupted file errors at me. I've redownloaded it and reinstalled it, but it even gives corrupt files on the AL director's cut zip. And I *know* that one should work, cause otherwise there'd be a lot of moaning going on. Solutions? H4xorz? Wisdom?
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
floopyboo
The Biter
Pinheaded Pissant
Posts: 1017
Back by popular demand!
|
Get new winrars?
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Mootilda
Dead Member
Posts: 579
Reluctant Modder
|
Try 7Zip. Works well for me. http://www.7-zip.org/Other suggestions: Scan your hard drive for errors. Defragment your hard drive. Try putting the compressed files on a different disk. Scan for viruses, spyware, adware, SecuROM, ... An unhealthy system can produce odd problems like this.
|
|
« Last Edit: 2008 October 28, 16:58:29 by Mootilda »
|
Logged
|
I don't think this level of hostility is necessary
|
|
|
Gastfyr
Horrible Halfwit
Posts: 392
|
You're slightly stupid in risking issues caused by references in the game .exe not matching core files.
Hmm. What sort of issues are we risking here?
|
|
|
Logged
|
TS3: it's really cool if you don't look too closely! - bottles
|
|
|
Argon
Juvenile Jackass
Posts: 456
What Would Brian Kinney Do?
|
I don't know if there's already a link somewhere to the 1.16.0.187 (AL patch 1) anywhere, so here's one for those who want it. http://www.mediafire.com/?0mkzy2u23nm
|
|
|
Logged
|
Desktop: Intel Core 2 Duo 3.0 GHz, 3GB RAM, Nvidia Ge-Force GTS 450 1GB, Sound Blaster X-Fi Titanium, WSXGA+ (1680x1050), Windows 7 Pro x64
Laptop: Sony VAIO VPCYB15KX, AMD Dual-Core E-350 1.60 GHz, 4GB RAM, AMD Radeon HD 6310, WXGA (1366x768), Windows 7 Pro x86
|
|
|
Mootilda
Dead Member
Posts: 579
Reluctant Modder
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
I don't think this level of hostility is necessary
|
|
|
kazebird
Irritating Ignoramus
Posts: 449
|
Thats great! I can finally install the damn thing.
|
|
« Last Edit: 2008 October 30, 21:04:35 by parrot »
|
Logged
|
"Of course I'm alright! But supposing I wasn't alright! I mean, this thing makes me feel in such a way that I'd be very worried if I felt like that about somebody else feeling like this about that. Do you understand?"
|
|
|
Annette
Dimwitted Dunce
Posts: 159
|
Baa Mootilda, I especially like the fact that you included the actual patch number for those of us that are easily confused. The first North American mirror wasn't working for me but the second was. So now I'd better brave the BBS and get the patch.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Nepheris
Irritating Ignoramus
Posts: 448
|
Direct question for Mr. Awesome himself:
Do you suggest getting the new patch or sticking with the unpatched game and your fixes?
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
J. M. Pescado
|
Patch p1 is recommended. There is presently no opinion on p2 due to SecuROM.
|
|
|
Logged
|
Grant me the serenity to accept the things I cannot change, the courage to change the things I cannot accept, and the wisdom to hide the bodies of those I had to kill because they pissed me off.
|
|
|
Mootilda
Dead Member
Posts: 579
Reluctant Modder
|
I must be the eternal optimist... I keep hoping that EA will actually fix something with these patches.
Now that the no-cd for patch 2 is available, is there any verdict on whether we can continue to use alfixes with patch 2?
|
|
|
Logged
|
I don't think this level of hostility is necessary
|
|
|
kazebird
Irritating Ignoramus
Posts: 449
|
I still use AL fixes, and my game is fine.
|
|
|
Logged
|
"Of course I'm alright! But supposing I wasn't alright! I mean, this thing makes me feel in such a way that I'd be very worried if I felt like that about somebody else feeling like this about that. Do you understand?"
|
|
|
Catbat
Asinine Airhead
Posts: 26
|
Stupid question, which one do I download? I see there is a V 1.0, V1.16.0.187 and a V1.16.0.194. Does anyone know the difference? Or do I need all 3? Sorry for the noob question, just trying to avoid having to post in at the Podium when I end up breaking my game.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Xiomberg
Asinine Airhead
Posts: 14
|
V1.0 = For AL no patch V1.16.0.187 = For AL patch 1 V1.16.0.194 = For AL patch 2
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
J. M. Pescado
|
Now that the no-cd for patch 2 is available, is there any verdict on whether we can continue to use alfixes with patch 2? Yes: Although SOME of the horribly crippling issues are fixed, not all of them are. EAxis fixes are also generally insuperior and don't do as good a job.
|
|
|
Logged
|
Grant me the serenity to accept the things I cannot change, the courage to change the things I cannot accept, and the wisdom to hide the bodies of those I had to kill because they pissed me off.
|
|
|
Catbat
Asinine Airhead
Posts: 26
|
V1.0 = For AL no patch V1.16.0.187 = For AL patch 1 V1.16.0.194 = For AL patch 2
Thank you, Xiomberg. Now, do I need all 3? I have not downloaded either patch, as of yet. Do these build on each other, or do I just used the last(est) version? Again, so for the noobness, I have not used an EAxis patch before, due to the horror stories post-patch. But I figured it was bad enough this time to actually try it.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
BrokenRobot
Dimwitted Dunce
Posts: 160
sekrit Republican
|
You only need the latest versions of everything. You should also install all of the other EA patches. Pescado doesn't bother fixing every little bug that has already been addressed in an official patch.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Catbat
Asinine Airhead
Posts: 26
|
Got it! Thanks, BrokenRobot.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Insanity Prelude
Juvenile Jackass
Posts: 488
|
Just because I'm not totally clear- installing the patch doesn't give you SuckuROM, right? I'm wondering how it got back on my computer (... is it in the ARRed version?)
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Mootilda
Dead Member
Posts: 579
Reluctant Modder
|
Installing the patch doesn't give you SecuROM. However, running the patched EXE without a no-cd will give you SecuROM.
|
|
|
Logged
|
I don't think this level of hostility is necessary
|
|
|
Insanity Prelude
Juvenile Jackass
Posts: 488
|
Okay. Awesome, guess I'll be putting the patch in eventually then.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Insanity Prelude
Juvenile Jackass
Posts: 488
|
Okay, so I forgot before applying the patch that I'd made objects.package read-only. The patch ran without any errors, but... is the objects.package file supposed to be listed as having last been changed in early October?
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|