The whole concept of having to install something to take away a feature, proves to me that the idea is faulty.
<blink> JMs hacks are often for taking away stuff - no what's this, no memory spam like that. Maxis is a bit strange about their "features".
This neatly illustrates the point that the idea is faulty, but the faulty idea is clearly in the strange Maxian ideas.
I agree, Monique's computer is cool. People need to understand that JM considers anything not made by him or TJ (and possibly Crammyboy now that he's here) as "non-awesome."
Pretty much, yeah. And like it says in the warning label, "Do not open, crush, dispose of in fire, put in backwards, short-circuit, or mix
with non-awesome hacks - may explode, leak, or catch fire, resulting in injury
and/or death.". Plus, non-awesome is not a statement of the technical merit of a product. Merely that it is non-Awesome(tm).
We have the responsibility of knowing what we put on our computer and reading the information painstakingly provided so we know of any potential conflicts, and then informing the modder of any problems we find in as clear and concise a manner as we can (not just "It don't work!") This is how the community works together to solve problems and produce products that are better than each one could have produced individually.
Actually, we prefer verbose over concise. When reporting a problem, it is preferred if the user is verbose.
Author