More Awesome Than You!
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
2024 November 14, 17:24:03

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
540287 Posts in 18067 Topics by 6545 Members
Latest Member: cincinancy
* Home Help Search Login Register
+  More Awesome Than You!
|-+  TS3/TSM: The Pudding
| |-+  The World Of Pudding
| | |-+  Important notice from the GRAMMAR POLICE. Plz read. This means you.
0 Members and 27 Chinese Bots are viewing this topic. « previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 32 33 [34] 35 36 THANKS THIS IS GREAT Print
Author Topic: Important notice from the GRAMMAR POLICE. Plz read. This means you.  (Read 526283 times)
rufio
Non-Standard
Uncouth Undesirable
****
Posts: 3030


More Nonstandard Than You


View Profile WWW
Re: Important notice from the GRAMMAR POLICE. Plz read. This means you.
« Reply #825 on: 2009 July 27, 08:46:06 »
THANKS THIS IS GREAT

That is not an answer to "When is it OK to use a sentence fragment for effect?"
Logged

I was thinking about these things and I am a feminist.

Liz
Stupid Schlemiel
****
Posts: 1889

Li'l Shiv will totally cut a bitch.


View Profile
Re: Important notice from the GRAMMAR POLICE. Plz read. This means you.
« Reply #826 on: 2009 July 27, 10:02:19 »
THANKS THIS IS GREAT

"When is it OK to use a sentence fragment for effect?"

The simplest answer? If you don't know whether it's okay to use a fragment for effect, it's not okay. If you know it's okay, it's okay. That sounds like total smartassery, but it isn't meant to be. Much.

If one is proficient at mechanics and rules, she can effectively proceed to experiment with form. Against a solid, grammatical foundation, embellishments and deviations contrast properly as the stylistic flourishes they are meant to be. But if one fails to lay that foundation, any choices she might wish to explain as stylistic fail to achieve merit, lost as they are among the comma splices, sentence fragments, and other linguistic rubble.
Logged

"It is always useful to face an enemy who is prepared to die for his country. This means that both you and he have exactly the same aim in mind." -General Tacticus
rufio
Non-Standard
Uncouth Undesirable
****
Posts: 3030


More Nonstandard Than You


View Profile WWW
Re: Important notice from the GRAMMAR POLICE. Plz read. This means you.
« Reply #827 on: 2009 July 27, 10:11:27 »
THANKS THIS IS GREAT

The simplest answer? If you don't know whether it's okay to use a fragment for effect, it's not okay. If you know it's okay, it's okay.

Well I do know - or, I thought I did, and I wanted to know what the rules are according to rohina, who apparently thinks they are different.

Quote
If one is proficient at mechanics and rules, she can effectively proceed to experiment with form. Against a solid, grammatical foundation, embellishments and deviations contrast properly as the stylistic flourishes they are meant to be. But if one fails to lay that foundation, any choices she might wish to explain as stylistic fail to achieve merit, lost as they are among the comma splices, sentence fragments, and other linguistic rubble.

Well, the criticism leveled at the person using a sentence fragment for effect was that they were using a sentence fragment.  So, we are back to the same question - at what point does using a sentence fragment for effect not count as an error which precludes one from using sentence fragments for effect?  Or is it possible that there are actual rules about when sentence fragments are erroneous or not?
Logged

I was thinking about these things and I am a feminist.

Baronetess
Lorelei
Grammar Police
*
Posts: 6512


I like pie. A cake is fine, too.


View Profile
Re: Important notice from the GRAMMAR POLICE. Plz read. This means you.
« Reply #828 on: 2009 July 27, 10:51:12 »
THANKS THIS IS GREAT

That is not an answer to "When is it OK to use a sentence fragment for effect?"

When it is clear from your output that you have mastered the basic rules and guidelines, you can occasionally deviate for stylistic effect.

A single instance that underscores failure to grasp the basic rules, however, means that your "stylistic" choice to use a fragment (or whatever non-standard deviations you indulge in) will be seen as ignorance of the rules, and not a stylistic flourish.

Example: Grammar Police occasionally insert Catois or Internet memes into posts on MATY. Grammar Police have demonstrated a grasp of the rules and guidelines of grammar. Only the most dense observer assumes that the Grammar Police could not, if they so chose, rephrase the concepts and communication demonstrated by their post contents into sentences appropriate for the most eggheady applications.

Also, the art analogy again holds true: once you know the basic rules and how to properly use the materials traditionally associated with the genre of art you wish to master, you can experiment with both the basic building block rules and substitute different materials or use materials in a new way. You have to learn your basic colour wheel before you start discussing colour theory and the traditionally accepted symbolism associated with certain colour choices and combinations before announcing that your personally-developed non-standard symbolism is completely different but just as easy to "read".

To dumb it down even more, since this seems to be hard to grasp: you must learn to WALK before you RUN.
Logged


Super INTJ.    MATY's Big Cat.    LOLcult.   Pescado: Like the ancient Egyptians, the Internet worships cats.
rufio
Non-Standard
Uncouth Undesirable
****
Posts: 3030


More Nonstandard Than You


View Profile WWW
Re: Important notice from the GRAMMAR POLICE. Plz read. This means you.
« Reply #829 on: 2009 July 27, 11:08:19 »
THANKS THIS IS GREAT

A single instance that underscores failure to grasp the basic rules, however, means that your "stylistic" choice to use a fragment (or whatever non-standard deviations you indulge in) will be seen as ignorance of the rules, and not a stylistic flourish.

So I take it that rohina and all of the Grammar Police have never once, in their entire lives, made a mistake in spelling or typing, or uttered a speech error.

Just to be clear, here.   Roll Eyes
Logged

I was thinking about these things and I am a feminist.

Baronetess
Lorelei
Grammar Police
*
Posts: 6512


I like pie. A cake is fine, too.


View Profile
Re: Important notice from the GRAMMAR POLICE. Plz read. This means you.
« Reply #830 on: 2009 July 27, 13:00:32 »
THANKS THIS IS GREAT

A single instance that underscores failure to grasp the basic rules, however, means that your "stylistic" choice to use a fragment (or whatever non-standard deviations you indulge in) will be seen as ignorance of the rules, and not a stylistic flourish.

So I take it that rohina and all of the Grammar Police have never once, in their entire lives, made a mistake in spelling or typing, or uttered a speech error.

Just to be clear, here.   Roll Eyes

Again, since you are being thick, there is a difference between an error made due to ignorance, and an error made due to a typographical error, slip of the tongue, or botched edit. It is usually evident which type of error it is. If you find that you're unsure, the next few posts from the same writer generally serve to clarify whether it is stupidity or an atypical blunder.

ETR: A very unkind comment that served no useful purpose and would serve to distract further.
Logged


Super INTJ.    MATY's Big Cat.    LOLcult.   Pescado: Like the ancient Egyptians, the Internet worships cats.
rufio
Non-Standard
Uncouth Undesirable
****
Posts: 3030


More Nonstandard Than You


View Profile WWW
Re: Important notice from the GRAMMAR POLICE. Plz read. This means you.
« Reply #831 on: 2009 July 27, 13:21:30 »
THANKS THIS IS GREAT

Again, since you are being thick, there is a difference between an error made due to ignorance, and an error made due to a typographical error, slip of the tongue, or botched edit. It is usually evident which type of error it is. If you find that you're unsure, the next few posts from the same writer generally serve to clarify whether it is stupidity or an atypical blunder.

So, going back to the topic at hand, what horrible blunders has Midwing made that her sentence-fragment-for-effect was interpreted as an error?  As far as I can tell (at least on this thread) her only crime was agreeing with rohina about the sad state of the education system.
Logged

I was thinking about these things and I am a feminist.

Baronetess
Lorelei
Grammar Police
*
Posts: 6512


I like pie. A cake is fine, too.


View Profile
Re: Important notice from the GRAMMAR POLICE. Plz read. This means you.
« Reply #832 on: 2009 July 27, 13:39:01 »
THANKS THIS IS GREAT

You'll need to waggle your headpeen at the people who corrected Midwing, rufio. I haven't said anything about his / her / its posts.
Logged


Super INTJ.    MATY's Big Cat.    LOLcult.   Pescado: Like the ancient Egyptians, the Internet worships cats.
rufio
Non-Standard
Uncouth Undesirable
****
Posts: 3030


More Nonstandard Than You


View Profile WWW
Re: Important notice from the GRAMMAR POLICE. Plz read. This means you.
« Reply #833 on: 2009 July 27, 13:44:22 »
THANKS THIS IS GREAT

"The people who corrected Midwing" have decided that they are not going to talk to me because I am not up to date with standard stylistics terminology.  Maybe you could hazard a guess as to their motivations?
Logged

I was thinking about these things and I am a feminist.

stephyd
Asinine Airhead

Posts: 6


View Profile
Re: Important notice from the GRAMMAR POLICE. Plz read. This means you.
« Reply #834 on: 2009 July 27, 14:30:35 »
THANKS THIS IS GREAT

whayay man/hinny, divn't get yer niccas in a twist!
Logged
Jelenedra
The New "Gay"
Whiny Wussy
*****
Posts: 7582


Evil Mastermind BehindTorturing Emo 12s


View Profile
Re: Important notice from the GRAMMAR POLICE. Plz read. This means you.
« Reply #835 on: 2009 July 27, 14:41:28 »
THANKS THIS IS GREAT

My guess as to when sentence fragments are okay:

If the sentence being in a fragment adds something to the style or the voice of the writing. If it doesn't contribute anything, then it just makes you sound like a tard. In other words, if it doesn't benefit from being a sentence fragment, why do it?

Anyways, the only time you really see sentence fragments as acceptable forms of expression would be during first person narratives. They have no place in essays (except maybe one about personal opinions or a non-English class essay question).

Quotations would be another exception.

(((Of course, I am by no means an expert. No surprise there. Most of it just seems to be common sense.)))


In a forum, you can get away with more sentence fragments than you would in other forms of expression. Considering that you are "talking" on a forum. The only time you see people get jumped on for fragments on a forum is when you get a hamtard that communicates like this:

"lololol totaly broke my game. My sim was bed bath now hall chair lololol do u noe what happeneded?"

or

whayay man/hinny, divn't get yer niccas in a twist!

WTF was that? Seriously, WTF was that?
« Last Edit: 2009 July 27, 16:06:53 by Jelenedra » Logged

Quote from: reggikko
Quote from: J. M. Pescado
Why are all these damn hippies on my website?
We are on your forum, taking over your world and making your children gay.
rufio
Non-Standard
Uncouth Undesirable
****
Posts: 3030


More Nonstandard Than You


View Profile WWW
Re: Important notice from the GRAMMAR POLICE. Plz read. This means you.
« Reply #836 on: 2009 July 27, 16:04:49 »
THANKS THIS IS GREAT

If the sentence being in a fragment adds something to the style or the voice of the writing. If it doesn't contribute anything, then it just makes you sound like a tard. In other words, if it doesn't benefit from being a sentence fragment, why do it?

This is my intuition also, but apparently there is some kind of hierarchy of Who Is Allowed To Use Fragments and Who Is Not Allowed To Use Fragments here.

Quote
exceptable

You mean "acceptable".

Quote
In a forum, you can get away with more sentence fragments than you would in other forms of expression. Considering that you are "talking" on a forum. The only time you see people get jumped on for fragments on a forum is when you get a hamtard that communicates like this:

"lololol totaly broke my game. My sim was bed bath now hall chair lololol do u noe what happeneded?"

And that's why I was wondering why Midwing was getting jumped on.
Logged

I was thinking about these things and I am a feminist.

Jelenedra
The New "Gay"
Whiny Wussy
*****
Posts: 7582


Evil Mastermind BehindTorturing Emo 12s


View Profile
Re: Important notice from the GRAMMAR POLICE. Plz read. This means you.
« Reply #837 on: 2009 July 27, 16:12:24 »
THANKS THIS IS GREAT

If the sentence being in a fragment adds something to the style or the voice of the writing. If it doesn't contribute anything, then it just makes you sound like a tard. In other words, if it doesn't benefit from being a sentence fragment, why do it?

This is my intuition also, but apparently there is some kind of hierarchy of Who Is Allowed To Use Fragments and Who Is Not Allowed To Use Fragments here.

I think there this an unspoken rule about n00bs blasting out grammar fragments like a grenade went off in their first few posts. It seems to be the difference between standing respectably while the teacher introduces you to a new classroom and jumping up on a school desk and doing the Bartman dance.

Quote
exceptable

Quote
You mean "acceptable".
Yes, I did. Sorry.  Tongue Three edits, and I missed that each time.

Quote
In a forum, you can get away with more sentence fragments than you would in other forms of expression. Considering that you are "talking" on a forum. The only time you see people get jumped on for fragments on a forum is when you get a hamtard that communicates like this:

"lololol totaly broke my game. My sim was bed bath now hall chair lololol do u noe what happeneded?"
Quote
And that's why I was wondering why Midwing was getting jumped on.

I can't answer that one, I skimmed over Midwing's intro to the thread.
« Last Edit: 2009 July 27, 16:20:17 by Jelenedra » Logged

Quote from: reggikko
Quote from: J. M. Pescado
Why are all these damn hippies on my website?
We are on your forum, taking over your world and making your children gay.
Count
jolrei
Senator
*
Posts: 6420


Son of Perdition


View Profile
Re: Important notice from the GRAMMAR POLICE. Plz read. This means you.
« Reply #838 on: 2009 July 27, 16:14:35 »
THANKS THIS IS GREAT

I think that after 34 pages of this totally interesting go-nowhere argument between rufio and pretty much everyone else (special recognition to rohina for persistence), it behooves us to revisit the original purpose of this thread, just for nostalgia's sake.

Since the tidal wave of sheep shows no sign of letting up, and the most important task is sorting the occasional nugget of wheat from the chaff, Pescado has strongly suggested that grammatical errors and other behaviour demanding the sharp spork be handled by a barrage of PMs, rather than excessive poking in the thread. You may also like to take your guffaws to any relevant thread in RL, such as Miss Sheeple 2009.

I will be taking notice of the naughty and the nice with regard to respecting this decree, for Grammar Day Awards purposes. If warranted, someone can make a thread in RL to post the butthurt responses to the PM barrage.

Thank you for co-operation.

OH, and if you are a SHEEP reading this, then FUCKING LEARN TO SPELL, ASSHOLE.

See?  It wasn't even remotely about rufio.  I find this refreshing and enlightening.

Also, the word "futility" springs to mind.  (Yes, I know one should not start a sentence with "also" - it's non-standard.)
Logged


Tribulatio proxima est
Marchioness
rohina
Horny Turkey
Grammar Police
*
Posts: 14042


"So MEAN!"


View Profile
Re: Important notice from the GRAMMAR POLICE. Plz read. This means you.
« Reply #839 on: 2009 July 27, 16:17:21 »
THANKS THIS IS GREAT

rufio, I answered your question; Lorelei gave you a similar answer in a different way; hell, even Jelly gestured at an answer, although hers is very simplistic. What you want is a set of rules for when it is okay to use a fragment; but there aren't "rules" in the way you want them. The point I was making with the questions I gave you was that if you can explain the stylistic function of a fragment, then it may have "merit" or be arguably effective.

Since you aren't really capable of understanding rhetorical analysis - it isn't about "interpretation" the way you appear to think - it isn't possible to explain the mechanics of it to you in any sophisticated way. I would suggest you take Jelly's simplistic explanation and be satisfied.

Following the rule, then, of "you can use fragments for effect if you have demonstrated you know the difference between a complete sentence and an incomplete sentence," Midwing is fail because its previous attempts at sentences had included gibberish, and the fragment it wrote was dreadful both stylistically and from a "your sentence, do she make any sense" point of view.
Logged

Jelenedra
The New "Gay"
Whiny Wussy
*****
Posts: 7582


Evil Mastermind BehindTorturing Emo 12s


View Profile
Re: Important notice from the GRAMMAR POLICE. Plz read. This means you.
« Reply #840 on: 2009 July 27, 16:18:50 »
THANKS THIS IS GREAT

(Yes, I know one should not start a sentence with "also" - it's non-standard.)

You're not? Well, shit, no wonder I get a Grammar Boot every year.  Tongue What's the reasoning?
Logged

Quote from: reggikko
Quote from: J. M. Pescado
Why are all these damn hippies on my website?
We are on your forum, taking over your world and making your children gay.
Count
jolrei
Senator
*
Posts: 6420


Son of Perdition


View Profile
Re: Important notice from the GRAMMAR POLICE. Plz read. This means you.
« Reply #841 on: 2009 July 27, 16:23:49 »
THANKS THIS IS GREAT

I don't really know specifically.  I learned my grammar a long time ago, and occasionally do an update, but the basic rules are now fully incorporated into the "it does/doesn't sound right" part of functional memory.  I think, a term like "additionally" would be more correct, whereas "also" is a more vernacular "common usage" type of thing, but technically incorrect.  It does appear to have a certain stylistic correctness on the internet, and is certainly used a lot as a sentence starter, so it has some level of common acceptance, depending on the context.  I wouldn't use it as a starter in formal text.

Then again, perhaps I'm just wrong.
Logged


Tribulatio proxima est
Jelenedra
The New "Gay"
Whiny Wussy
*****
Posts: 7582


Evil Mastermind BehindTorturing Emo 12s


View Profile
Re: Important notice from the GRAMMAR POLICE. Plz read. This means you.
« Reply #842 on: 2009 July 27, 16:28:10 »
THANKS THIS IS GREAT

I don't really know specifically.  I learned my grammar a long time ago, and occasionally do an update, but the basic rules are now fully incorporated into the "it does/doesn't sound right" part of functional memory.  I think, a term like "additionally" would be more correct, whereas "also" is a more vernacular "common usage" type of thing, but technically incorrect.  It does appear to have a certain stylistic correctness on the internet, and is certainly used a lot as a sentence starter, so it has some level of common acceptance, depending on the context.  I wouldn't use it as a starter in formal text.

Then again, perhaps I'm just wrong.

I want to say that I've used it in essays and never had an odd remark about it. I had some pretty old school Comp teachers too. They didn't believe in using sentence fragments for effect. =p I wouldn't think they would let "also sentences" slide. I could be wrong about that, though. Who knows about the thought processes of teachers I had ages ago might've been.
Logged

Quote from: reggikko
Quote from: J. M. Pescado
Why are all these damn hippies on my website?
We are on your forum, taking over your world and making your children gay.
rufio
Non-Standard
Uncouth Undesirable
****
Posts: 3030


More Nonstandard Than You


View Profile WWW
Re: Important notice from the GRAMMAR POLICE. Plz read. This means you.
« Reply #843 on: 2009 July 27, 16:45:44 »
THANKS THIS IS GREAT

I think that after 34 pages of this totally interesting go-nowhere argument between rufio and pretty much everyone else (special recognition to rohina for persistence), it behooves us to revisit the original purpose of this thread, just for nostalgia's sake.

Actually, I think you'll find that I did not even post in this thread until page 9, did not post in response to rohina until page 13, and did not post about grammar until page 21.  The issue on page 21 was an unrelated argument; the current one has only been going on for three pages.

Since you aren't really capable of understanding rhetorical analysis - it isn't about "interpretation" the way you appear to think - it isn't possible to explain the mechanics of it to you in any sophisticated way. I would suggest you take Jelly's simplistic explanation and be satisfied.

You are obviously looking for specific terms, and are going to reject any attempts to answer your questions that do not contain those terms.  I used the word "interpretation" only since I knew you were unlikely to accept any answer having to do with tone and pitch, as you claim to have no internal voice while reading.  Generally, when I think of "style" I think of the way something "sounds" while I'm reading it; you obviously mean a more concrete and universal set of literary devices, and since I no longer remember what they are, I will not be able to answer your question to your satisfaction.  It's not a matter of not understanding them, just of not having properly memorized a list.  I answered because I was under the impression that there would be some pearls of wisdom at the end of it, but I obviously forgot it was you I was talking to.

Quote
Midwing is fail because its previous attempts at sentences had included gibberish, and the fragment it wrote was dreadful both stylistically and from a "your sentence, do she make any sense" point of view.

Where did this gibberish take place?  Everything she posted in this thread is easy to read and more or less grammatically correct.  You just decided to throw a hissy fit because she used an unfamiliar turn of phrase.

ETA:  Proper quote tags.
« Last Edit: 2009 July 27, 17:54:11 by rufio » Logged

I was thinking about these things and I am a feminist.

Marchioness
rohina
Horny Turkey
Grammar Police
*
Posts: 14042


"So MEAN!"


View Profile
Re: Important notice from the GRAMMAR POLICE. Plz read. This means you.
« Reply #844 on: 2009 July 27, 17:19:10 »
THANKS THIS IS GREAT

Specific terms would have been nice, but that wasn't what I wanted, no.

The fragment made no sense. You are going to refuse to acknowledge that, no matter what I say, so I will not discuss it with you further.
Logged

rufio
Non-Standard
Uncouth Undesirable
****
Posts: 3030


More Nonstandard Than You


View Profile WWW
Re: Important notice from the GRAMMAR POLICE. Plz read. This means you.
« Reply #845 on: 2009 July 27, 17:57:24 »
THANKS THIS IS GREAT

Specific terms would have been nice, but that wasn't what I wanted, no.

What did you want?  I'm curious.

(The fragment made sense to me, because as a fragment it implied a tone of voice to me that has a particular meaning when used IRL.  I can see why you didn't see that, though.)
Logged

I was thinking about these things and I am a feminist.

Marchioness
rohina
Horny Turkey
Grammar Police
*
Posts: 14042


"So MEAN!"


View Profile
Re: Important notice from the GRAMMAR POLICE. Plz read. This means you.
« Reply #846 on: 2009 July 27, 18:06:11 »
THANKS THIS IS GREAT

Well, the implied "tone of voice" you identify isn't really a concept that other people might discern by reading.
Logged

rufio
Non-Standard
Uncouth Undesirable
****
Posts: 3030


More Nonstandard Than You


View Profile WWW
Re: Important notice from the GRAMMAR POLICE. Plz read. This means you.
« Reply #847 on: 2009 July 27, 18:21:12 »
THANKS THIS IS GREAT

Actually, your lack of inner voice is fairly nonstandard.
Logged

I was thinking about these things and I am a feminist.

Marchioness
rohina
Horny Turkey
Grammar Police
*
Posts: 14042


"So MEAN!"


View Profile
Re: Important notice from the GRAMMAR POLICE. Plz read. This means you.
« Reply #848 on: 2009 July 27, 18:28:13 »
THANKS THIS IS GREAT

Actually, your lack of inner voice is fairly nonstandard.

My point, you ridiculous tosspot, is that "this is how it sounds to MY inner voice" is a bullshit statement as far as meaning anything to anyone else is concerned. Because guess why? NO ONE CAN HEAR RUFIO'S INNER VOICE, EXCEPT RUFIO.

Also, "lack of inner voice" is complete misrepresentation. I said I didn't HAVE to hear stuff in my head. No that I couldn't.
Logged

rufio
Non-Standard
Uncouth Undesirable
****
Posts: 3030


More Nonstandard Than You


View Profile WWW
Re: Important notice from the GRAMMAR POLICE. Plz read. This means you.
« Reply #849 on: 2009 July 27, 18:34:00 »
THANKS THIS IS GREAT

The structure (and any number of semantic cues) imply the tone of voice, generally.

In any case, that part was in parentheses because it was not the main part of my post.  What did you want to hear from the little quiz you gave me?
Logged

I was thinking about these things and I am a feminist.

Pages: 1 ... 32 33 [34] 35 36 Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.067 seconds with 19 queries.